New immigration fees
The fees for immigration applications made from both inside the UK (often referred to by immigration lawyers as ‘in country’ applications) and outside the UK at visa posts (referred to as ‘out of country’ applications) are going up very significantly on 2 April 2007.
In country application fees were only introduced for the first time in the summer of 2003 and have already been increased once. The current levels are £335 for applications made by post (£225 for student applications by post) and £500 for an on-the-day in-person application made at one of the Home Office Public Enquiry Offices. The new fees are set out in full on the Home Office website, but include the following monstrously high figures:
- Indefinite Leave to Remain postal application: £775 (was £335)
- Indefinite Leave to Remain on the day application: £950 (was £500)
- British nationality application: £575 (was £200)
There are also slightly more moderate increases for student applications (£250 to £295) and general leave to remain applications (£335 to £395). On the day leave to remain applications rise from £500 to £595.
Most lawyers advise their clients to pay for an on-the-day application if they can possibly afford it, to avoid the problems that arise when an application is submitted before expiry of the existing visa but the Home Office make a decision after thevisa has expired. If the new application is granted, there is no problem, but if the application gets returned as invalid or is refused, the applicant is left in a tricky situation and will find it difficult to make another application without becoming an overstayer and committing a criminal offence. There is also still a problem with the Home Office losing documents submitted with postal applications, although this is unusual.
The out of country visa fees are also going up significantly:
- Settlement visa (e.g. spouse): £500 (was £260)
- Work permit visa: £200 (was £85)
- Long term visa: £200 (was £85)
- Student visa: £99 (was £85)
- Visitor visa: £63 (was £50)
The new immigration fees can be seen as part of a trend towards a purely economic and utilitarian rationale for inward migration to the UK. The Home Office don’t want poor migrants coming to the UK, or least don’t want poor migrants coming to the UK on top of those from the expanded European Union. Don Flynn’s pamphlet Tough As Old Boots: Asylum, Immigration and the Paradox of New Labour Policy makes fascinating reading and offers a compelling analysis of immigration policy since 1997. Events since the pamphlet was published in 2003 only serve to reinforce how right Flynn was. Essentially, he argues that New Labour have abandoned any old fashioned notions of rights and the innate desirability of family unity and cultural exchange in favour of a drive towards modernisation of the economy, entailing purely economic, modernising inward migration of highly skilled and entrepreneurial types.
More pragmatically, there’s also the fact that Home Office expenditure on immigration and asylum, as on many other areas of responsibility, has increased enormously in the last few years and the Treasury isn’t handing over enough new cash. Someone has to pay for Home Office failings and pet projects, and in this instance it’s the immigrants.
3 Responses to New immigration fees
@freemvntblog
- Vintage Mash: May ‘thought illegal immigrants had tentacles’ thedailymash.co.uk/politics/polit… 11 hours ago
- Border hopefuls queueing long enough to gain citizenship thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/b… 11 hours ago
- Article 3 medical treatment cases are worth fighting, grim case of GS (India) overturned: freemovement.org.uk/2012/05/17/gs-… 17 hours ago
- RT @Paul_Dillane: New UKBA Operational Guidance Note on DRC. Section on returns of particular interest - bia.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/do… 23 hours ago
- RT @Paul_Dillane: UKBA issue its first Operational Guidance Note on Gambia. Very helpful bia.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/do… 23 hours ago
Immigration cases- R (on the application of SS)v London Borough of Croydon (AAJR) [2012] UKUT 139 (IAC) (16 May 2012) 16 May 2012
- R (on the application of ES) v London Borough of Hounslow (AAJR) [2012] UKUT 138 (IAC) (15 May 2012) 16 May 2012
- MK (documents - relocation) Iraq CG [2012] UKUT 126 (IAC) (25 April 2012) 14 May 2012
- Mumu (paragraph 320; Article 8; scope) Bangladesh [2012] UKUT 143 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Ahmadi (s.47 decision: validity; Sapkota) Afghanistan [2012] UKUT 147 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Buama (inter-country adoption - competent court) Ghana [2012] UKUT 146 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Barnett and others (EEA Regulations: rights and documentation) Jamaica [2012] UKUT 142 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- LK (Somalia)), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1229 (Admin) (10 May 2012) 10 May 2012
UK Border Agency- Removing full right of appeal for family visitors 10 May 2012
- Scrapping family visitor appeal rights will save millions 10 May 2012
- Service disruption at public enquiry offices 4 May 2012
- Child experts recruited to Family Returns Panel 25 April 2012
- Tier 2 certificates of sponsorship allocations for 2012/13 20 April 2012
Immigration news- Damian Green questioned by MPs over Heathrow delays: Politics live blog 18 May 2012
- In this week's New Statesman: European Crisis 17 May 2012
- New rules on overseas students 'will cost universities billions' 17 May 2012
- Dissenting Tories pushed out of backbench committee 17 May 2012
- Europe’s endgame 16 May 2012
Policy and research- Why asking the public to report irregular migrants to the UKBA is the wrong path to go down 17 May 2012
- "Home Office plans are too harsh" - Letter to the editor 16 May 2012
- Maps/Multimedia 16 May 2012
- Focus on Africa/Africans 16 May 2012
- Focus on Statelessness 15 May 2012
- The Free Movement blog is written mainly by barristers in the immigration team at Renaissance Chambers
Free email updates
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog by email- or get a Kindle blog subscription
Blog topics
Latest from HJT Training
- Drafting a statement. Drafting representations. Completing a Notice of Appeal. Dont miss out on these topics! hjt-training.co.uk/venues/1855-92… 2 days ago
- New courses. New SRA regulations. Comply or get FINED! hjt-training.co.uk/services/immig… 3 days ago
- Employment Law: Age Discrimination and the effect of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Seldon and Homer hjt-training.co.uk/venues/1842-92… 1 week ago
- EU, Human Right and PBS Update - Book all 3 course for £300 - thats 9 CPD!! Great offer once again! 2 weeks ago
- OISC Level 1 Manchester now £180 + VAT offer ends 30th April hjt-training.co.uk/venues/1856-92… 3 weeks ago
Disclaimer
The information and commentary on this blog is provided free of charge for information purposes only. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person. Views expressed in blog posts are those of the author only, not Renaissance Chambers as a whole.












Thank you for this humane comment on the new visa application fees. I am a spouse of a foreign national and we have just been notified, to our horror, of the increases (about which there was no prior warning on the Home Office website).
I understand from the government news website that the considerable extra income is to be spent on
- adding muscle to enforcement operations against illegal immigrants
- increasing detention capacity for illegal immigrants
- intelligence gathering about illegal workers
- increasing removals of illegal workers.
What perverse logic, to increase the burden upon legal and honest immigrant workers in order to prosecute the illegal and dishonest. Surely this is going to encourage greater fee evasion?
Yours in great dismay,
Sarah
[...] looking for information about the increased immigration fees, about which I have already written a post. I thought it would be instructive to post up the old immigration fees, the new ones and the [...]
[...] looking for information about the increased immigration fees, about which I have already written a post. I thought it would be instructive to post up the old immigration fees, the new ones and the [...]