COIS to revert to CIPU
The Country of Origin Information Service (COIS) at the Home Office is the successor to the generally derided Country Information and Policy Unit (CIPU). CIPU reports were poorly researched and outright biased against asylum seekers, although many immigration judges mistakenly treated them as the whole truth. In 2004 the Immigration Advisory Service did an excellent report on CIPU. They checked every quote against the purported source. Often the source simply didn’t say anything resembling the alleged quote, or the first half of a sentence would be included but the qualifier omitted. For example, “The human rights situation in x country is generally good” would be quoted but the second half of the original sentence, “apart from for x, y and z minorities, who are subject to government persecution”, would not. Rather misleading, some might think.
CIPU was eventually broken up into an information section and a policy section. The information section was renamed COIS and became part of the (relatively) reputable and professional RDS within the Home Office, rather than remaining within what was then the Immigration and Nationality Directorate and is now UKBA.
In the last few years the Advisory Panel on Country Information (APCI) has done sterling work looking over COIS reports and the quality of the reports has improved dramatically. COIS undoubtedly sometimes get things wrong, and the last Afghanistan report was slated by the APCI, but generally things are much improved and the information is reliable and balanced.
Now, the information and policy arms are apparently to be reunited. All of the good work by COIS staff over the last few years is set to be undone. It should be clear to anyone that there is no way that policy and information can be combined without the quality and impartiality of the information being compromised. This is definitely a retrograde step.
2 Responses to COIS to revert to CIPU
@freemvntblog
- Legal update on EEA 'other family members': Advocate General opinion analysis: freemovement.org.uk/2012/05/18/adv… 50 minutes ago
- Vintage Mash: May ‘thought illegal immigrants had tentacles’ thedailymash.co.uk/politics/polit… 12 hours ago
- Border hopefuls queueing long enough to gain citizenship thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/b… 12 hours ago
- Article 3 medical treatment cases are worth fighting, grim case of GS (India) overturned: freemovement.org.uk/2012/05/17/gs-… 18 hours ago
- RT @Paul_Dillane: New UKBA Operational Guidance Note on DRC. Section on returns of particular interest - bia.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/do… 1 day ago
Immigration cases- R (on the application of SS)v London Borough of Croydon (AAJR) [2012] UKUT 139 (IAC) (16 May 2012) 16 May 2012
- R (on the application of ES) v London Borough of Hounslow (AAJR) [2012] UKUT 138 (IAC) (15 May 2012) 16 May 2012
- MK (documents - relocation) Iraq CG [2012] UKUT 126 (IAC) (25 April 2012) 14 May 2012
- Mumu (paragraph 320; Article 8; scope) Bangladesh [2012] UKUT 143 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Ahmadi (s.47 decision: validity; Sapkota) Afghanistan [2012] UKUT 147 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Buama (inter-country adoption - competent court) Ghana [2012] UKUT 146 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- Barnett and others (EEA Regulations: rights and documentation) Jamaica [2012] UKUT 142 (IAC) (14 May 2012) 14 May 2012
- LK (Somalia)), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1229 (Admin) (10 May 2012) 10 May 2012
UK Border Agency- Removing full right of appeal for family visitors 10 May 2012
- Scrapping family visitor appeal rights will save millions 10 May 2012
- Service disruption at public enquiry offices 4 May 2012
- Child experts recruited to Family Returns Panel 25 April 2012
- Tier 2 certificates of sponsorship allocations for 2012/13 20 April 2012
Immigration news- Damian Green questioned by MPs over Heathrow delays: Politics live blog 18 May 2012
- In this week's New Statesman: European Crisis 17 May 2012
- New rules on overseas students 'will cost universities billions' 17 May 2012
- Dissenting Tories pushed out of backbench committee 17 May 2012
- Europe’s endgame 16 May 2012
Policy and research- Why asking the public to report irregular migrants to the UKBA is the wrong path to go down 17 May 2012
- "Home Office plans are too harsh" - Letter to the editor 16 May 2012
- Maps/Multimedia 16 May 2012
- Focus on Africa/Africans 16 May 2012
- Focus on Statelessness 15 May 2012
- The Free Movement blog is written mainly by barristers in the immigration team at Renaissance Chambers
Free email updates
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog by email- or get a Kindle blog subscription
Blog topics
Latest from HJT Training
- Drafting a statement. Drafting representations. Completing a Notice of Appeal. Dont miss out on these topics! hjt-training.co.uk/venues/1855-92… 2 days ago
- New courses. New SRA regulations. Comply or get FINED! hjt-training.co.uk/services/immig… 3 days ago
- Employment Law: Age Discrimination and the effect of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Seldon and Homer hjt-training.co.uk/venues/1842-92… 1 week ago
- EU, Human Right and PBS Update - Book all 3 course for £300 - thats 9 CPD!! Great offer once again! 2 weeks ago
- OISC Level 1 Manchester now £180 + VAT offer ends 30th April hjt-training.co.uk/venues/1856-92… 3 weeks ago
Disclaimer
The information and commentary on this blog is provided free of charge for information purposes only. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person. Views expressed in blog posts are those of the author only, not Renaissance Chambers as a whole.












Could not agree more, especially as asylum caseworkers are expected to use COIS (either through reports or requests) as their primary, if not only, source of reliable information. I can’s say I think that the combination of role will inevitably lead to a reduction in the quality of the reports but a separation of competing interests has to be a better system.
Of course that assumes that policy and information are competing interests, which they really shouldn’t be…
An out of date quote, but this is what Ockleton had to say about the then CIPU in Devaseelan (Para 75);
“We note that the CIPU Bulletin is also a partisan document, in that it comes from an organ of the Respondent. It is, however, little more than a compendium of material from other published sources, which are listed in the bibliography. They range from reports of international organs, through various governmental bodies in Britain and abroad, to news reports around the world. The Bulletin is arranged in such a way that the source of each statement in it can readily be traced.”
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIAT/2002/00702.html
Caseowners/workers will look first to the OGN then the CIPU, thankfully the tendency of cutting and pasting vast swathes into RFRL’s seems to have diminished (i.e. in Tamil cases).
LondonHopo