News from On High

By On 26 November 2009 · 5 Comments · In Cases

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of claimants in two immigration cases today.

In R (on the application of A) v London Borough of Croydon their Lordships have ruled that it is for the courts to decide age assessment issues. The courts should not simply defer to local authorities, as was being held by the Administrative Court and Court of Appeal. While there is certainly a resources imperative at local authorities to assess children as adults and lawyers have been concerned this is happening in practice, this outcome certainly doesn’t mean no more disputed age assessments. It does re-open the door to independent age assessments, depending on the outcome of the appeal against Collins J’s decision that pediatrician age assessments are a load of hocus pocus.

In BA Nigeria v SSHD their Lordships have upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] EWCA Civ 119, which means that there is an in-country appeal if a person advances a human rights claim, even if UKBA do not believe the claim constitutes a fresh claim as defined by Immigration Rule 353. There are, however, other ways for UKBA to act to limit appeal rights, primarily through a clearly unfounded certificate under s.94 2002 Act, which is what they have started to do in recent months.

More analysis to follow, in a bit of a rush at the moment.

 
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it
Reddit Facebook Twitter Delicious Mixx StumbleUpon Digg

5 Responses to News from On High

  1. vulture says:
    26 November 2009 at 3:26 pm

    Dear FM

    Given the general magnificence of your site for which none of us will ever be able to thank you enough it seems well, bumptious in the extreme to point it out – but I think you meant to describe the Croydon case when you were describing BA Nigeria

    • freemovement says:
      26 November 2009 at 4:48 pm

      You are undoubtedly right, many thanks for pointing that out. As I said earlier, I was in a rush! Correction made.

  2. BA (Nigeria) judgment « Free Movement says:
    2 December 2009 at 9:00 am

    [...] (Nigeria) judgment Following on from my earlier alerter post, I’ve now had time to properly read and start digesting the Supreme Court judgment in BA [...]

  3. Last week’s other decisions – media coverage? [updated] « UKSC blog says:
    23 March 2010 at 7:47 pm

    [...] case summary in the Solicitor’s Journal.  A reader draws our attention to a short note in the excellent "Free Movement Blog". Otherwise, silence. The clear and helpful press [...]

  4. Amanda says:
    25 April 2010 at 12:06 am

    Age assessments are an interesting area – I’ve come across some where the appellant has been accepted as a minor, and I’ve thought, “come off it, he’s as old as I am”, and some where obviously immature young people have been assessed as 20 or so.