All Articles: Procedure

Do not lodge Upper Tribunal judicial reviews by post if urgent

Following my previous post on Judicial review in the Upper Tribunal someone got in touch with a total horror story. She attempted to lodge a judicial review by fax to the Upper Tribunal. There was no initial response but on enquiry by telephone the n. ...

17th December 2013 By

Judicial review in the Upper Tribunal

Since 17 October 2011, some immigration judicial reviews have been heard in the Upper Tribunal. Until now this was confined to asylum fresh claims and disputed age assessments. From 1 November 2013 most new immigration judicial reviews are heard in .. ...

12th December 2013 By

R (Ignaoua) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, CA

The Court of Appeal has held, overturning the decision of the High Court (see previous blog), that the issue of a certificate under section 15 Justice and Security Act 2013 does not have the effect of terminating existing judicial review proceedings. ...

11th December 2013 By

Home Office immigration tribunal advocacy

Two mundane, day to day things are getting my goat at the moment. The first is the mislabeled "cross examination" many Home Office Presenting Officers are trained into and allowed to get away with at court. The other is Presenting Officer failure to . ...

4th December 2013 By

Are asylum appeal hearings the same wherever they are heard?

Both parties and practitioners are entitled to expect that the practice and procedure of the court in which their case is heard will be consistent and fair irrespective of which court it is and where it is.  Yet a Freedom of Information Act 2000 requ ...

30th November 2013 By

Mohammed (late application-First-tier Tribunal) Somalia [2013] UKUT 467 (IAC)

Short procedural point to this one and the use of some invisible magic hats: Where an application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal is made to the First-tier Tribunal outside the prescribed period, rule 24(4) of the Asylum and Immigrati.. ...

28th November 2013 By

R (Ignaoua) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

In R (Ignaoua) [2013] EWHC 2512, the Administrative Court held that under powers conferred by section 15 Justice and Security Act 2013 the Secretary of State can automatically and unilaterally terminate qualifying judicial review proceedings.  The a ...

13th November 2013 By

Residence test threatens access to justice for children

On Wednesday 23rd October 2013, Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights heard oral evidence on the government's latest proposals to cut legal aid. The evidence was clear.  Those that will suffer the most from the proposals are society’s most ...

8th November 2013 By

Administrative review success rates

The new Immigration Bill proposes removal of rights of appeal to an independent judge, to be replaced with  and replacement with 'Administrative Review' by one of its own staff. Immigration appeals have almost a 50% success rate according to the Gove ...

4th November 2013 By

Appeals and the Immigration Bill

The new Immigration Bill (see Ronan's previous post "Summary of clauses") is so packed with nastiness that some really unpleasant parts of it – perhaps the whole of it – will make it to the statute book. No mainstream politician with influence wil ...

31st October 2013 By

Home Office accused of ‘fixing’ asylum figures

The Observer has run a story on the use of withdrawal of appeals in order to hit success rate targets for Home Office officials. I'm quoted, as is the excellent James Packer of Duncan Lewis. For some background see previous post "Withdrawn decisions" ...

27th October 2013 By

Legal challenge to residence test for judicial review legal aid

The excellent Public Law Project are launching the challenge with Bindmans acting as solicitors. The grounds of challenge look pretty plausible.... Already a member? Login Thanks for reading You've reached your article limit A great deal of time and e ...

25th October 2013 By

Tony Blair (Hansard vol 213, col 43, 2 November 1992)

When a right of appeal is removed, what is removed is a valuable and necessary constraint on those who exercise original jurisdiction. That is true not merely of immigration officers but of anybody. The immigration officer who knows that his decisi ...

10th October 2013 By

Appeals to Court of Appeal from Cart judicial reviews

Just a quick note on this. As I previously mooted ('Judicial review of Upper Tribunal'), it is possible to appeal to the Court of Appeal from refusal of permission in a Cart-type judicial review of a decision of the Upper Tribunal to refuse permissio. ...

25th September 2013 By

Injunctions for removal from fast track

One overlooked solution to the one way asylum fast track to refusal and removal is to seek an injunction preventing consideration under the fast track process. This option should be seriously considered where the client has good grounds for asserting. ...

12th September 2013 By

Transfer of immigration judicial reviews to Upper Tribunal

It is finally almost upon us: the transfer of judicial review claims from the High Court to the Upper Tribunal will take place on 1 November 2013. In addition, applications for permission lodged after 9 September 2013, including those where permissio. ...

30th August 2013 By

Level playing field for extensions of time

Don’t let this one slip by unnoticed: Wang & Chin (Extension of time for appealing) [2013] UKUT 00343 (IAC) Colin recently alerted readers by way of a short post to the recently promulgated determination in Wang & Chin. If you have not done ...

6th August 2013 By

How not to write a determination

From the very first sentence of ML (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 844, one of the many end of term judgments issued last week, one knows there is going to be trouble: Of all the hackneyed phrases in the law,... ...

25th July 2013 By

Hope for Families Divided by the Income Threshold

Last week Monday, I represented a married couple in the husband’s immigration appeal in the First-Tier Tribunal instructed by Yomi Oni-Williams of Owens Solicitors.  I have the couple’s consent to write this post although there is no need for me ...

22nd July 2013 By

Khatel overturned

In the case of Secretary of State for the Home Department v Raju & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 754 the Court of Appeal has overturned the Upper tribunal's earlier judgment in Khatel and others (s85A; effect of continuing application) [2013] UKUT 44 (IAC). ...

22nd July 2013 By

Wang and Chin (extension of time for appealing) [2013] UKUT 343 (IAC)

Another short one. Not to be outdone, this time the Deputy President criticises a First Tier judge for extending time for appealing for the Secretary of State on the basis of an untrue and un-evidenced assertion. Guidance is given to judges (and by e. ...

19th July 2013 By

Anoliefo (permission to appeal) [2013] UKUT 345 (IAC)

Another short case. President criticises First Tier judge for granting permission on a technicality. Where there is no reasonable prospect that any error of law alleged in the grounds of appeal could have made a difference to the outcome, permission . ...

19th July 2013 By

Boodhoo (EEA Regs: relevant evidence) [2013] UKUT 00346 (IAC)

In an EEA appeal the tribunal may consider even evidence of a matter arising after the date of decision providing it is relevant to the substance of the decision, in this case evidence of comprehensive sickness insurance which only began after the da. ...

19th July 2013 By

F (Para 320(8); type of leave) USA

F (Para 320(8); type of leave) USA [2013] UKUT 00309 (IAC) New reported immigration tribunal case on paragraph 320(18) of the immigration rules, one of the discretionary general grounds for refusal. The Entry Clearance Officer had failed to exerci... ...

10th July 2013 By

Will the real Article 8 please stand up!

In the reported case of Green (Article 8 – new rules) [2013] UKUT 254 (IAC), the Upper Tribunal again reaffirmed that despite the Immigration Rules pertaining to incorporate Article 8, tribunals should continue to consider the substantive Article 8 ...

19th June 2013 By

MOJ CUTS versus THE RULE OF LAW

If the cuts to the scope of legal aid brought by LASPO 2012 have been significant, the cuts proposed by the Ministry of Justice in the recent consultation “Transforming legal aid: delivering a more credible and efficient system” would be severe. I ...

3rd June 2013 By

Charter fights

  Take Off by Dave Keeshan At Renaissance Chambers we have been involved with a number of recent Afghani and Pakistani (Ahmadi) charter flight cases and injunctions. I have noticed a couple of things that are troubling me. Firstly some of the ... ...

31st May 2013 By

Ahmadis and fast track asylum appeals

The Baitul Futuh Mosque in London Many thanks to Eric Fripp of Lamb Building for the following note: On 8th May 2013 in the First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) at York House, a panel consisting of First Tier Tribunal Judges Woodc... A ...

30th May 2013 By

Chikwamba delivers again

Last month saw the advent of a very useful decision from the High Court concerning the lack of provision in the Immigration Rules to allow migrants in the Points-Based System to switch whilst in-country into a PBS dependent category: Zhang, R (on the ...

28th May 2013 By

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Chapti/Bibi on pre-entry English tests

Fluent English It has been over a year since the High Court heard a challenge to the introduction of pre-entry English language tests for spouses and partners (and fiancés and proposed civil partners). It was argued in Chapti & Ors, R (on the ... ...

15th April 2013 By

Withdrawn decisions

All appellant advocates appearing before the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal will be familiar with the growing trend for UK Border Agency Presenting Officers to withdraw decisions either very shortly before or even at the ap. ...

10th April 2013 By

No Removals to Cyprus

The Court of Appeal in the UK has very recently granted stays preventing the removal of asylum-seekers to Cyprus under Dublin II. The proceedings have been stayed pending the appeal against the judgment in EM (Eritrea) & Ors v SSHD [2012] EWCA Ci. ...

28th March 2013 By

More Evidential Flexibility Policy instructions disclosed

Bendy rule A big thank you goes to Jane Heybroek of Bell Yard Chambers for persisting with her Freedom of Information request in relation to further documents concerning the Evidential Flexibility policy.  You can access the disclosure here.  The .. ...

6th March 2013 By

Evidence in the tribunal

CM (EM country guidance; disclosure) Zimbabwe CG [2013] UKUT 59 (IAC) is important not only as Country Guidance on Zimbabwe but also on the law of evidence in the immigration tribunal. The broad effect of the Country Guidance findings are summaris... ...

13th February 2013 By

Marriage and civil partnerships inspection report

The latest report by John Vine, the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, was published this week. It concerns applications to enter, remain and settle in the UK on the basis of marriage and civil partnerships and the summary of rec ...

31st January 2013 By

Awards of costs in immigration cases

Pound Coins by William Warby Litigation is an expensive business, and immigration is a litigious business. As the recent brouhaha around judicial review revealed, the vast majority of judicial review cases in the High Court and on appeal up to the C.. ...

28th January 2013 By

Christmas time

Christmas rules Just a reminder that time does not run over the Christmas period for lodging appeals in the First-tier Tribunal against its decisions. See the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (Procedure) Rules 2005 (as heavily amended) rule 2 defin... ...

27th December 2012 By

Judicial review consultation

The consultation on changes to the procedure for judicial review has opened and it closes on 24 January 2013. Regular readers will recall that these proposals were said by David Cameron to be part of the Government's efforts to combat the recession, . ...

14th December 2012 By

Two sides of the same coin

Following on from the case of Ahmadi ( s. 47 decision: validity; Sapkota) [2012] UKUT 00147 (IAC)  the Upper Tribunal has (for now) resolved the perplexing issue of what to do when the Secretary of State combines a refusal to vary leave with a Sectio ...

29th November 2012 By

“A series of small omissions and unfortunate developments…”

The reported Upper Tribunal case of Kalidas (agreed facts – best practice) [2012] UKUT 00327 (IAC) underscores some important points of practice and procedure in the First Tier Tribunal (FTT). The case concerned an appeal before the FTT where it a.. ...

23rd November 2012 By

Quick Reads