Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
Immigration bail training course out now
Former Taliban recruiter allowed to stay in the UK after being cleared of war crimes

Former Taliban recruiter allowed to stay in the UK after being cleared of war crimes

The anonymous protagonist in Secretary of State for the Home Department v BK (Afghanistan) [2019] EWCA Civ 1358 fled Afghanistan for the UK in 2002. He claimed that he had been press-ganged into recruiting for the Taliban, admitting that the role included beating up unwilling villagers. Rejecting his bid for asylum in 2004, an immigration judge found that BK “followed the instructions of his commander and harassed, arrested, detained, tortured and killed people”.

BK eventually settled in the UK anyway, having married a British woman. But the 2004 judgment floated up again when he came to apply for British citizenship years later, and the Home Office cancelled his indefinite leave to remain in 2014. This decision was taken on the basis that BK hadn’t revealed his complicity in war crimes during his settlement and citizenship applications: hence his indefinite leave was “obtained as a result of false information given by him or his failure to disclose material facts” (paragraph 2A, Schedule 2, Immigration Act 1971).

The Upper Tribunal allowed BK’s appeal against the cancellation of his indefinite leave to remain. It effectively revisited the 2004 decision, pointing out BK had never admitted to anything worse than assaulting people under duress, and that the material before the judge did not support the finding that he had tortured or killed anybody.

eBook Refugee law in the UK: a practical guide

Accessible guide to the law and practice of refugee status determination in the UK including examples, arguments and common scenarios.

ebook View Now

In the Court of Appeal, the Home Office attacked the tribunal’s reopening of previous finding of fact as contrary to the rule in Devaseelan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKIAT 702

Lady Justice Rose backed BK, but stressed that the circumstances were exceptional. There was no asylum interview before the 2004 hearing where the allegations of war crimes could have been explored, and not much evidence in general for the 2004 judge to go on:

this was an unusual case which was not covered by any of the paragraphs of the Devaseelan guidance. A conscientious tribunal would not have been acting fairly if they had decided that BK had tortured and killed people and hence had committed war crimes and was a person of bad character and hence that his answers to the terrorist activity questions were inaccurate, all on the strength of a few words in the [Presenting Officer’s] Notes which were at best bordering on illegible.

The Court of Appeal then went on to consider whether BK had been dishonest in answering the questions about past terrorism/war crimes. The Home Office argued that “in the light of the 2004 Decision findings, the only possible truthful answer these questions was yes”. But Rose LJ brushed this aside: now that it was established that the 2004 decision was wrong to find that BK had committed war crimes, he could hardly be faulted for denying it.

CJ McKinney

CJ is Free Movement's deputy editor. He's here to make sure that the website is on top of everything that happens in the world of immigration law, whether by writing articles, commissioning them out or considering submissions. When not writing about immigration law, CJ covers wider legal affairs at the website Legal Cheek and on Twitter: follow him @mckinneytweets.

X
Not yet a member?

Get unlimited access to articles, a thriving forum, free e-books, online training materials with downloadable training certificates, and much more.

Worried about preparing an immigration application yourself?

Try our Full Representation Service, provided by Seraphus Solicitors.

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Clear, transparent fees
  • Fees fixed for each stage of your application or appeal
  • Personal client web access page and messaging system
  • Online payments, document upload & video calls
  • Expert representation
Shares