Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
OISC Level 1 ebook now available: FREE to members
“Genuine chance of being engaged” test for retaining EU worker status found unlawful
Credit: Claudio Hirschberger on Unsplash

“Genuine chance of being engaged” test for retaining EU worker status found unlawful

EU citizens do not have to prove that they have a “genuine chance of being engaged” in order to retain worker status under European Union law, the Upper Tribunal has held. The case is KH v Bury MBC and SSWP [2020] UKUT 50 (AAC).

Martin Williams of the Child Poverty Action Group brought the case on behalf of KH, a Polish citizen. KH needed to prove that she retained the status of worker after being unemployed for over six months, in order to keep her housing benefit. Standing in her way were the EEA Regulations, which provide (in both the 2006 and 2016 versions) that someone in this position must “provide evidence that [s]he is seeking employment and has a genuine chance of being engaged”.

KH argued that this test was unlawful. All the Citizens’ Rights Directive requires of people to keep their worker status is “being in duly recorded involuntary employment and registration as a jobseeker at the relevant employment office”. The UK adding on a genuine chance of being engaged test undermined the directive.

Upper Tribunal Judge Wright agreed:

As a matter of EU law, when it is properly understood, having a genuine chance of being engaged in employment is no part of the test for retained worker status…

It follows, according to paragraph 26 of the judgment, that regulations 6(2)(b)(ii) and 6(2)(c)(ii) of the EEA Regulations 2016, and their equivalents in the 2006 Regulations, are “unlawful and of no legal effect”.

The Child Poverty Action Group has published its own case summary, available here.

CJ McKinney

CJ is Free Movement's deputy editor. He's here to make sure that the website is on top of everything that happens in the world of immigration law, whether by writing articles, commissioning them out or considering submissions. When not writing about immigration law, CJ covers wider legal affairs at the website Legal Cheek and on Twitter: follow him @mckinneytweets.

There are comments on this article.

Only members can view and comment on articles, as well as many other benefits.

Explore membership now
X
Not yet a member?

Get unlimited access to articles, a thriving forum, free e-books, online training materials with downloadable training certificates, and much more.

Worried about preparing an immigration application yourself?

Try our Full Representation Service, provided by Seraphus Solicitors.

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Clear, transparent fees
  • Fees fixed for each stage of your application or appeal
  • Personal client web access page and messaging system
  • Online payments, document upload & video calls
  • Expert representation
Shares