Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Incompetence, neglect and failure to show due diligence

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

In the week before Christmas, at a time when national procrastination levels are at an annual high, the Home Office has had another warning about the need to get on with things when people are locked up.  Hot on the heels of JS (Sudan) v SSHD [2013] EWCA Civ 1378 (Free Movement report here) the High Court again held detention unlawful in an automatic deportation case where the Home Office failed to make much of an effort to consider whether the detainee should be deported.

Simple procrastination flowchart
Simple procrastination flowchart

In R (Ismail) v SSHD [2013] EWHC 3921 (Admin), Mrs Justice Lang held 9 months of detention unlawful as a result of the defendant’s “incompetence, neglect and failure to show due diligence”.  The Secretary of State had taken an incredible 18 months to make a decision on whether to deport a man who throughout that time had indefinite leave to remain.  Even when a decision finally arrived, at the door of court, it was so inadequate that it got the nationality of the detainee’s children wrong.

Less simple procrastination flowchart.  I wonder what the person who invented this chart was supposed to be doing at the time?  Because it wasn’t this
Less simple procrastination flowchart. I wonder what the person who invented this chart was supposed to be doing at the time? Because it wasn’t this

The Court held that, even allowing for pressure of work, the decision should have been made as early as last February.  If the Secretary of State had put half the resources into considering his case as went into fighting the judicial review it might have been earlier still.

The solicitor in the case was Waleed Sheikh at Leigh Day.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Greg Ó Ceallaigh

Greg Ó Ceallaigh

Greg is a barrister specialising in asylum, immigration and public law at Garden Court Chambers. He deals with many Dublin third country removals including to Italy.

Comments