- BY Mary Atkinson
JCWI survey on the impact of the MM (Lebanon) minimum income ruling
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
Please help us at JCWI understand if the Supreme Court judgment in MM (Lebanon) has made any difference on the ground.
The Minimum Income Requirement (the income threshold that British citizens and settled residents have to meet in order to sponsor a partner from outside the European Economic Area) continues to hit families hard. The policy, first implemented in 2012, has previously been challenged in the courts, with the Supreme Court finding in 2017 that the Home Office must make changes to the policy in order to avoid breaches of Article 8 and to protect the best interests of children.
From some of the cases that JCWI has seen, it is not clear whether the changes recommended by the Supreme Court are having effect on the ground.
JCWI is keen to gather as much evidence as possible about practitioners’ experience of working with clients who are applying under Appendix FM. In particular, we are considering how the Minimum Income Requirement impacts on groups with protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010, and whether this is lawful.
All insights that practitioners are able to share based on their experience making these applications will be extremely valuable, and will help us determine what impact the changes mandated by the Supreme Court in 2017 have had on decision-making.
SHARE
