Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Immigration update podcast, episode 18

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

Welcome to the June 2015 edition of the Free Movement immigration update podcast. In this episode I talk about where we are now on the detained fast track, cover a few tribunal cases and then finish with some important and useful higher court cases and a couple of mentions for some recently published books. The material is drawn mainly from the June blog posts on Free Movement.

If you would like to claim CPD points for reading the material and listening to this podcast, sign up here as a Free Movement Member. There are now 40 CPD hours of training materials available to members.

If you listen to podcasts on your mobile phone, you can subscribe for free via iTunes here, Stitcher here or point your podcast player to podcast feed for Free Movement. Using a mobile device and subscribing has the advantage that each new podcast can be automatically downloaded for listening to on the go.

Fast track

Tribunal cases

Higher cases

Book reviews

Relevant articles chosen for you
Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.

Comments

2 Responses

  1. Colin, DO ETS-affected clients have an out-of-country appeal right? I don’t think so. It was abolished from 6th April. I have pleaded so in a Court of Session petition and the Home Office admit it – they still seek ouster on the basis that the applicant ought to have left the UK before the repeal came into force. Had he done so and marked his appeal from abroad before then, he would have had an appeal right. But if not, not. It puzzles me that this has not been picked up either in Gazi or Shahbaz Ali.

    1. Interesting question! Will give it some thought and get back to you. Need to write up a couple of recent negative UT determinations on related issues and will work it into one of those.