Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
OISC Level 1 ebook now available: FREE to members
Legal aid advice in detention centres “generally poor”

Legal aid advice in detention centres “generally poor”

An explosion in the number of firms given detention centre legal aid contracts has seriously diluted the quality of advice, according to the charity Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID).

BID says that that handing out contracts to dozens of often inexperienced solicitors’ firms instead of a few specialists has “led to a severe depletion in the quality of legal advice in immigration detention”.

The system for delivering free legal advice to immigration detainees was overhauled in September 2018. Where there had been eight or nine firms with Detained Duty Advice contracts, there are now 77.

A BID survey of immigration detainees, published today, has found that “the quality of advice given in the DDA surgeries was generally poor”.

Of the 53 detainees surveyed who had spoken to a legal aid lawyer, only eight had anything positive to say about the experience. Most said that their appointment lasted less than 20 minutes.

Although lawyers providing legal aid surgeries are required to take on all cases that have merit, BID has evidence that this is not happening. Freedom of Information data shows that “low take-up rate is evidently a serious problem”, with several firms taking on no clients from surgeries at all. Another firm saw 250 people at surgeries and took on just three. 

In a number of cases, solicitors “sought to persuade detainees to pay them
privately to conduct work on the case, without pursuing legal aid through the ‘exceptional case funding’ process”.

BID recommends that the number of Detained Duty Advice providers be reduced, and that the Legal Aid Agency review the qualify of advice on offer.

CJ McKinney

CJ is Free Movement's deputy editor. He's here to make sure that the website is on top of everything that happens in the world of immigration law, whether by writing articles, commissioning them out or considering submissions. When not writing about immigration law, CJ covers wider legal affairs at the website Legal Cheek and on Twitter: follow him @mckinneytweets.

X
Not yet a member?

Get unlimited access to articles, a thriving forum, free e-books, online training materials with downloadable training certificates, and much more.

Worried about preparing an immigration application yourself?

Try our Full Representation Service, provided by Seraphus Solicitors.

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Clear, transparent fees
  • Fees fixed for each stage of your application or appeal
  • Personal client web access page and messaging system
  • Online payments, document upload & video calls
  • Expert representation
Shares