Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
EU Settlement Scheme course now available FREE to members
Misfeasance in public office

Misfeasance in public office

UKBA got away with an appeal against a finding of misfeasance in public office in the new case of Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 453, but lost on the award of exemplary damages. In the course of judgment Lord Justice Thomas held that the award of £27,000

was needed to stigmatise the conduct of the officials at the Home Office as an outrageous and arbitrary exercise of executive power

While the appalling facts of the case might surprise some (prolonged detention of a Dutch national when there was no power to do so), I have a case pending where UKBA refused to release a detainee even though there was DNA evidence that the detainee was British and even after bail had been granted. Unbelievably, they are choosing to fight the case. Maybe we’ll get a finding of misfeasance on those facts…

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.

There are comments on this article.

Only members can view and comment on articles, as well as many other benefits.

Explore membership now
X
Not yet a member?

Get unlimited access to articles, a thriving forum, free e-books, online training materials with downloadable training certificates, and much more.

Worried about preparing an immigration application yourself?

Try our Full Representation Service, provided by Seraphus Solicitors.

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Clear, transparent fees
  • Fees fixed for each stage of your application or appeal
  • Personal client web access page and messaging system
  • Online payments, document upload & video calls
  • Expert representation
Shares