The case of Rodriguez, Mandalia and Patel  EWCA Civ 2 is to be reconsidered by the Supreme Court, this months grants of permission reveals. The case concerns the ‘evidential flexibility’ policy that I think was first publicly revealed here on Free Movement. It is a chance for the Supreme Court to grapple with the insanely complex requirements of the PBS and consider whether the system is a fair and lawful one. Also going up to the Supreme Court is TN (Afghanistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWCA Civ 1609 on the issue of whether judicial review is an adequate remedy for the purposes of EU law on asylum.
12th June 2014 By Colin Yeo