Updates, commentary and advice on immigration and asylum law
New citizenship deprivation course available now
Removals to Mogadishu are re-starting

Removals to Mogadishu are re-starting

The Home Office have started giving directions for the removal of failed asylum seekers to Mogadishu on Turkish Airline flights via Istanbul.

Anyone given such removal directions might ask the Home Office to reconsider whether they risk violating their human rights in the light of the announcement by Al Shabaab on 29.12.2013 that Somalis who have returned to their homeland from abroad “have been taught garbage and sins, and have lost [their] religion and are being used [to spread evil] ” and so “will be killed and fought against in the same manner” that al-Shabaab fights against the Somali government.  “They are working for the infidels, and since they are working for the infidels, they are the same as the infidels they are working for as far as we are concerned,” said Al-Shabaab commander Ali Mohamed Hussein, known as Ali Jesto.

Plane taking off
Take Off by Dave Keeshan

They might consider relying on the UN Secretary General’s letter to the UN Security Council of 14.10.2013   in which he reported that

‘the political progress made over the past year and the military gains against Al-Shabaab that have been achieved in recent years are at serious risk of being reversed’.

He expressed the concern that as well as causing the deaths of many innocent civilians

‘the deterioration in the security situation threatens to undermine the fragile Somali political process’.

They might also inform the Home Office that they wish to rely upon the written and oral evidence of three country experts that is currently being considered by the Upper Tribunal (The President and Upper Tribunal Judges Storey and Southern) in a country guidance case addressing the issue of whether it is compatible with the UK’s international protection and human rights obligations to remove people to Mogadishu.  The expert evidence, heard over 4 days (10 – 13 February 2014) is being relied upon to say that it is not.  Whilst a person given removal directions to Mogadishu will not be in possession of that evidence, the Home Office is and so can be asked to review the person’s removal under paragraph 353 of the immigration rules by reference to that evidence.

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.

Not yet a member of Free Movement?

Sign up for as little as £20 plus VAT per month

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Unlimited access to all articles
  • Access to our forums
  • E-books for free
  • Access to all online training materials
  • Downloadable training certificates
Shares