Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
EU Settlement Scheme course now available FREE to members
Time to revisit spouse visa minimum income rule, government advisers suggest

Time to revisit spouse visa minimum income rule, government advisers suggest

The infamous minimum income rule for spouse visas should be reconsidered, the influential Migration Advisory Committee has suggested. The MAC, a crack team of economists that advises the government on immigration policy, says in its annual report:

We… think now would be an opportune time to reconsider the minimum income requirements associated with this route. The MAC are concerned that previous analysis may have given too much weight to the fiscal contribution of such migrants and insufficient attention to the benefits that accrue, to both the family and society, from the route. In addition, it is a considerable time since the current income requirements were introduced, so more evidence should now be available to review the impact of these requirements.

The “previous analysis” is the MAC’s own 2011 report (pdf) giving economic cover for the dramatic rise in the minimum income required to sponsor someone for a spouse visa that came in the following year. Although the committee can hardly be blamed for the general thrust of the policy, it clearly regrets its past role in designing the nuts and bolts. The MAC can now take the initiative in examining policy areas, so may decide to conduct a review without ministerial direction, although government-commissioned research will take priority and may leave no time for a review of minimum income.

The annual report also points to other policy areas that the MAC reckons are ripe for reform, such as investor visas, social care recruitment and the ban on asylum seekers working.

CJ is Free Movement's deputy editor. He's here to make sure that the website is on top of everything that happens in the world of immigration law, whether by writing articles, commissioning them out or considering pitches. When not writing about immigration law, CJ covers wider legal affairs at the website Legal Cheek and on Twitter: follow him @mckinneytweets.

There are comments on this article.

Only members can view and comment on articles, as well as many other benefits.

Explore membership now
Not yet a member?

Get unlimited access to articles, a thriving forum, free e-books, online training materials with downloadable training certificates, and much more.

Need to keep up-to-date on immigration, asylum and nationality law?

Sign up as a member from just £20 plus VAT per month

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Unlimited access to all blog posts
  • Access to our busy forum
  • Free downloads of all our ebooks
  • Hundreds of hours of training courses