Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
Immigration bail training course out now
Veteran solicitor a “front” for dodgy immigration practice
Credit: Legacy Legal Solicitors on Twitter

Veteran solicitor a “front” for dodgy immigration practice

A solicitor with 43 years’ experience has been struck off after allowing a group of supposed immigration lawyers to take over his firm and run off with all the client files.

Michael Smith was prosecuted by the Solicitors Regulation Authority for allowing himself to be “used as a front” for an immigration law practice without supervising it.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal said that Mr Smith, who qualified in 1976, had “demonstrated a complete disregard for his obligations as a solicitor”.

Mr Smith was a sole practitioner in the Shropshire town of Oswestry. In 2014, he met a man anonymised in the judgment as DSR, a qualified will writer. DSR successfully pitched the idea of going into business together by opening a Birmingham branch of the practice.

DSR appears to have been a cuckoo in the nest. Over the next couple of years, the practice mutated into an immigration law firm called Legacy Legal, with its head office in Birmingham and staffed by friends and relatives of DSR. The firm was to “target the Asian community and no one else”.

Mr Smith’s was still the name above the door for regulatory purposes, but his involvement in the firm was minimal. He had almost no experience in immigration law, had other commitments around the country and lived in France several days a week. He “never, ever met one client” of Legacy Legal.

Need affordable legal advice?
Arrange a video chat at a time that suits you. Use your own smartphone, pc/mac or tablet. No commitment, no risk.
chat
Talk to Us

The upshot was that, in Mr Smith’s words, DSR and his friends “were running an autonomous immigration practice” over which he had no control.

In October 2017, Mr Smith stopped by the office to find that his partner had done a runner and stripped it bare, taking all the client files for good measure. Over the following months, the Solicitors Regulation Authority received 30 complaints from former Legacy Legal clients, many of whom were elderly and/or with poor English.

Mr Smith did not attend the hearing and said in a witness statement that he now lives in Canada. He had previously told investigators “to me it was more of a hobby than anything else and when I got fed [up] with it I just said I am just retiring… to be frank with you I don’t give a monkey’s because I’ve retired”.

Asked whether he thought he had lived up to his regulatory responsibilities, Mr Smith said “probably from a regulator’s point of view, no”.

The tribunal agreed, finding that Mr Smith had failed to make adequate enquiry into the men he was allowing into the firm; allowed them to exercise control over it without setting any system of supervision; breached his reporting obligations as compliance officer; failed to ensure that client money was protected; and failed to keep proper accounts.

The panel struck him off and ordered that he pay £14,000 in costs. 

CJ McKinney

CJ is Free Movement's deputy editor. He's here to make sure that the website is on top of everything that happens in the world of immigration law, whether by writing articles, commissioning them out or considering submissions. When not writing about immigration law, CJ covers wider legal affairs at the website Legal Cheek and on Twitter: follow him @mckinneytweets.

X
Not yet a member?

Get unlimited access to articles, a thriving forum, free e-books, online training materials with downloadable training certificates, and much more.

Worried about preparing an immigration application yourself?

Try our Full Representation Service, provided by Seraphus Solicitors.

Join Now

Benefits Include

  • Clear, transparent fees
  • Fees fixed for each stage of your application or appeal
  • Personal client web access page and messaging system
  • Online payments, document upload & video calls
  • Expert representation
Shares