It’s early in the week, but already we’ve been hit by two biggish pieces of mainstream immigration news, neither of which really address real concerns, and nor will they have much of an impact.
There have been reports that the government are considering a number of different methods to put Bulgarians and Romanians from coming to the UK when visa restrictions are finally lifted later this year. One such method discussed was a campaign of discouraging posters. As the BBC explained it:
[there is] the idea potential migrants could be deterred by references to the downsides of British life, such as the amount of rain… with one unnamed minister quoted as saying such images could “correct the impression that the streets here are paved with gold”
In reality, posters are unlikely to have that much of an impact. We aren’t talking about people wondering where to go for a couple of weeks in August. These are people deciding where they want to work and live. I suspect most people base these decisions on a lot of factors: the availability of jobs, the standard of living, in some cases a a shared history or culture. A lot of the Eastern bloc migrants that I have known haven’t come because they were expecting streets paved with gold. Far from it, many come and work more than one job, often to support others in their home countries. They aren’t coming here for a good time or an easy life, they’re coming to provide for their families. What adverts are going to override that?
This story seems at odds with the Home Office development, their revamped citizenship test, to be launched in March, which could be seen as a celebration of our history and culture. As the Home Office explain,
The new book and test will focus on events and people who have contributed to making Britain great.
The Home Office twitter account released a few sample questions, including:
Which landmark is a prehistoric monument which still stands in the English county of Wiltshire?
B. Hadrian’s Wall
C. Offa’s Dyke
D. Fountains Abbey
The old citizenship test wasn’t perfect, but it helped to educate future British citizens on practical points on how society worked and services that made studying for the test at least a little bit useful. The new test is instead a lot like an A-level in General Studies: nice to have to bulk out a cv, but of little use beyond the odd pub quiz.
So what’s it going to be? A celebration of what makes Britain great, or a portrait of our country: warts and all? They affect different aspects of UK policy on migration, but together serve to illustrate a government that is incapable of considering the big picture. (see also their encouragement of foreign students at the same time as introducing cripplingly restrictive new rules).
Anyone interested in trying out the new test can do so here.