Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Home Office increases spending on child asylum seekers

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

The Home Office has announced that councils will get more money to care for children who arrive in the UK alone to seek asylum.

Councils used to get between £71 and £114 per child per day, depending on the age of the child and when they arrived in the UK. From now on it will be £114 per child per day across the board, backdated to 1 April 2019.

The Home Office says that this represents a total increase of £30 million a year. To put this context, council spending on these children was £152 million in 2017/18 — almost double the amount needed four years earlier. The Home Office does not say how much the funding increase brings its total outlay to, but it doesn’t seem to be fully reimbursing the councils: it says that it “provides a contribution to their costs”.

Immigration minister Caroline Nokes told Parliament:

The decision to increase these rates reflects the incredibly valuable work local authorities undertake with vulnerable UASC, and the Home Office commitment to supporting this.

The department also says that it is “working to reduce the time it takes to conclude UASC asylum cases. The Home Office is working with stakeholders to develop a new service standard to ensure a better prioritisation of cases”. This is in line with a statement to the Guardian this week that officials have “moved away from the six-month service standard [target]” for deciding asylum cases in general in order to prioritise the most vulnerable, including children.

Two separate reports last year had criticised delays in deciding child asylum cases. Elder Rahimi Solicitors interviewed some children who had been waiting for over two years for a decision, while the immigration inspector recorded that “non-straightforward cases were taking an average of 458 days.

Interested in refugee law? You might like Colin's book, imaginatively called "Refugee Law" and published by Bristol University Press.

Communicating important legal concepts in an approachable way, this is an essential guide for students, lawyers and non-specialists alike.

Relevant articles chosen for you
CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney is a specialist on immigration law and policy. Formerly the editor of Free Movement, you will find a lot of articles by CJ here on this website! Twitter: @mckinneytweets.

Comments