Immigration application cases

R (on the application of Forrester) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2307 (Admin): “This is a classic example of a thoroughly unreasonable and disproportionate, inflexible, application of a policy, without the slightest regard for the facts of the case, or indeed elementary common sense and humanity. Such an approach diminishes, rather than encourages, respect for the policy in question.”

R (on the application of Omar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3448 (Admin): application fee may breach human rights where application is on human rights and applicant cannot afford fee (blog post here)

Basnet (validity of application – respondent) [2012] UKUT 00113 (IAC): It is for UKBA to show that a fee has not ben paid if this is alleged. Further, the system of taking fees for postal applications risks being common law unfair.

BE (application fee: effect of non-payment) Mauritius [2008] UKAIT 00089: The application fee must be paid or made available for the application to be valid

We use cookies on this site to improve your experience. We only use anonymous cookies so we'll assume you are OK with this. Click here for more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.